EU: Collective Dominance and the EC Merger Regulation
Monday, 1 June 1998
Featured In: June / July 1998 (Vol. 1 Iss. 3)
Despite the evidential difficulties involved, the ECJ’s acceptance that the concept of collective dominance applies in Merger Regulation cases is an important step in ensuring the preservation of competition in highlyconcentrated markets. It is clear from the judgment that the evidential burden on the Commission to prove that a collective dominant position exists is high and the ECJ will not be easily satisfied that a situation of collective dominance has been proved by the Commission to exist.
Alexandra Poch
Freshfields Deringer
Brussels
PREMIUM Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by PREMIUM GCR subscribers.
A premium subscription includes 10 issues of the journal, 2 signature surveys - The GCR100 and Rating Enforcement, 10 GCR special reports and full access to current and archived print & online content.
If you are a GCR subscriber, please login to access this content:



Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to June / July 1998 (Vol. 1 Iss. 3)
Back to top