News RSS

Ireland: Prohibition of takeover by state forestry company

Monday, 1 June 1998

The Authority’s report is an interesting example of the divergences of view which can exist between regulators dealing with the same case. It has to be said that the minority report appears to give a more considered view of the potential effects of the merger per se than the report of the majority. If the Authority had been allowed more time to analyse the complex issues which arose in the case, it might have been possible for the differences of opinion between the Authority members to have been resolved. In any event, the Minister’s decision to prohibit the merger has dealt a major blow to Coillte’s strategic development which, ironically, was entirely consistent with the government’s strategy for the forestry sector in Ireland

Gerald FitzGerald
McCann FitzGerald
Dublin

PREMIUM Subscription required to view this article

This content can only be accessed by PREMIUM GCR subscribers.

A premium subscription includes 10 issues of the journal, 2 signature surveys - The GCR100 and Rating Enforcement, 10 GCR special reports and full access to current and archived print & online content.

If you are a GCR subscriber, please login to access this content:

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo International Bar Association logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalcompetitionreview.com | editorial@globalcompetitionreview.com