News RSS

Italy: Autorita turns spotlight on pharmaceuticals

Monday, 1 June 1998

Parallel behaviour on prices can be very lucrative in this sector where, because of the essential nature of pharmaceuticals, demand is very stable. More often than not, demand is determined by the doctor who prescribes the medicine rather than by the consumer. The problem of proving parallel conduct has always been a topical issue in competition law. In the absence of hard evidence pointing to contact between undertakings, it is likely that the Authority will rely on the Dyestuff case, in which the ECJ stated that price increases which are very similar in timing and rate of price change cannot be explained by independent market forces.

Salvatore Lamarca
Freshfields
Milan

PREMIUM Subscription required to view this article

This content can only be accessed by PREMIUM GCR subscribers.

A premium subscription includes 10 issues of the journal, 2 signature surveys - The GCR100 and Rating Enforcement, 10 GCR special reports and full access to current and archived print & online content.

If you are a GCR subscriber, please login to access this content:

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo International Bar Association logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalcompetitionreview.com | editorial@globalcompetitionreview.com