United Kingdom: Illegality under English law of contracts in breach of Article 85 EC
Monday, 1 February 1999
Featured In: February / March 1999 (Vol. 2 Iss. 1)
The Court ultimately rejected Gemmell’s argument that the beer tie breached Article 85, so its conclusions in respect of voidness and illegality were strictly obiter. However, there have recently been two High Court judgments which have followed the Court of Appeal’s reasoning, so it appears clear that the statements in Gibbs Mew may be treated as authoritative. Following the introduction of the new UK Competition Act 1998, the construction of which will be guided by English law judgments on corresponding matters of EC law, it would also appear that the courts are likely to take the same attitude towards contracts which breach the Act’s Chapter I prohibition, which mirrors Article 85.
Beverley Blakeney
Freshfields
London
PREMIUM Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by PREMIUM GCR subscribers.
A premium subscription includes 10 issues of the journal, 2 signature surveys - The GCR100 and Rating Enforcement, 10 GCR special reports and full access to current and archived print & online content.
If you are a GCR subscriber, please login to access this content:



Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to February / March 1999 (Vol. 2 Iss. 1)
Back to top