News RSS

United Kingdom: Illegality under English law of contracts in breach of Article 85 EC

Monday, 1 February 1999

The Court ultimately rejected Gemmell’s argument that the beer tie breached Article 85, so its conclusions in respect of voidness and illegality were strictly obiter. However, there have recently been two High Court judgments which have followed the Court of Appeal’s reasoning, so it appears clear that the statements in Gibbs Mew may be treated as authoritative. Following the introduction of the new UK Competition Act 1998, the construction of which will be guided by English law judgments on corresponding matters of EC law, it would also appear that the courts are likely to take the same attitude towards contracts which breach the Act’s Chapter I prohibition, which mirrors Article 85.

Beverley Blakeney
Freshfields
London

PREMIUM Subscription required to view this article

This content can only be accessed by PREMIUM GCR subscribers.

A premium subscription includes 10 issues of the journal, 2 signature surveys - The GCR100 and Rating Enforcement, 10 GCR special reports and full access to current and archived print & online content.

If you are a GCR subscriber, please login to access this content:

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo International Bar Association logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalcompetitionreview.com | editorial@globalcompetitionreview.com