Franchising: UK firm not liable for actions of its US franchising subsidiary
Thursday, 1 October 1998
Featured In: October / November 1998 (Vol. 1 Iss. 5)
Not much is left of the franchisees’ case on remand. Although the appeals court declined to dismiss the case outright and said it was 'not inconceivable' that a class action might be used 'in a carefully controlled manner', it appears that the franchisees will be limited to arguing that Meineke’s conduct constituted a breach of their particular versions of the franchise agreement. Any damages that may be awarded in the future would be limited to the lost profits that each franchisee could prove based on his or her individual circumstances.
Philip F Zeidman
Rudnick, Wolfe, Epstien & Zeidman
Washington DC
PREMIUM Subscription required to view this article
This content can only be accessed by PREMIUM GCR subscribers.
A premium subscription includes 10 issues of the journal, 2 signature surveys - The GCR100 and Rating Enforcement, 10 GCR special reports and full access to current and archived print & online content.
If you are a GCR subscriber, please login to access this content:



Comments
You must Subscribe or Log In to make comments.
Comment Terms & Conditions
Back to October / November 1998 (Vol. 1 Iss. 5)
Back to top