News RSS

Franchising: UK firm not liable for actions of its US franchising subsidiary

Thursday, 1 October 1998

Not much is left of the franchisees’ case on remand. Although the appeals court declined to dismiss the case outright and said it was 'not inconceivable' that a class action might be used 'in a carefully controlled manner', it appears that the franchisees will be limited to arguing that Meineke’s conduct constituted a breach of their particular versions of the franchise agreement. Any damages that may be awarded in the future would be limited to the lost profits that each franchisee could prove based on his or her individual circumstances.

Philip F Zeidman
Rudnick, Wolfe, Epstien & Zeidman
Washington DC

PREMIUM Subscription required to view this article

This content can only be accessed by PREMIUM GCR subscribers.

A premium subscription includes 10 issues of the journal, 2 signature surveys - The GCR100 and Rating Enforcement, 10 GCR special reports and full access to current and archived print & online content.

If you are a GCR subscriber, please login to access this content:

Law Business Research Ltd

87 Lancaster Road, London
W11 1QQ, UK
Queen's Award logo International Bar Association logo American Bar Association strategic partner logo

Copyright © 2012 Law Business Research Ltd. All rights reserved. | http://www.lbresearch.com

87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK | Tel: +44 207 908 1188 / Fax: +44 207 229 6910

http://www.globalcompetitionreview.com | editorial@globalcompetitionreview.com