GCR October 2011
Surveys: Germany, Boston China's AML Jon Leibowitz interview Comparing counsel Air Canada interview Book review
Journal Feature
A Meeting of Minds
When a company contemplates a merger, when it’s the subject of a dawn raid, or when it needs to devise a compliance programme, competition law advisors are never far from the scene. Those advisors may be a formidable team from a storied City firm. But working alongside any group of external antitrust advisers are their essential in-house counterparts. Each side brings its own specialist skills and expertise to the table, but with costs, policy agendas and ever-changing legal frameworks to contend with, professional relationships are frequently put to the test. Rachel Bull investigates
China’s third year
August marked the third anniversary of the passage of China’s Anti-Monopoly Law. Supporters say China’s competition authorities have shown demonstrable progress in enforcing those laws; critics claim there is much room for improvement. Ron Knox examines the development of China’s competition regime
An interview with Jon Leibowitz
In late July, officials from the US Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice’s antitrust division travelled to Beijing to sign a memorandum of understanding with China’s antitrust agencies. The agreement provides that both countries may work together on antitrust cases and mergers that could have an impact on both economies. In the weeks after the agreement was signed, FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz spoke to Ron Knox about its implications and the progress Chinese enforcers have made in the three years since the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) came into force
Book review: Anti-Monopoly Law and Practice in China
Authors: H Stephen Harris, Peter J Wang, Mark A Cohen, Yizhe Zhang and Sebastien J Evrard
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Price: US$295.00
Review by Vanessa Zhang, Principal, Global Economics Group
Country Survey: Germany
Germany’s competition bar
In most European countries, competition lawyers coalesce in a single city – usually the nation’s capital. But in Germany, vibrant antitrust practices are thriving in Dusseldorf, Hamburg, Frankfurt, Munich and Berlin. Emily Gray meets the teams practising across the country
An interview with Andreas Mundt
Andreas Mundt wins universal praise from Germany’s competition bar for his dynamic leadership of the country’s Federal Cartel Office. Emily Gray interviewed him
Country Survey: USA
Boston's competition bar
With its proximity to US antitrust hubs New York and Washington, DC, the antitrust bar in Boston can at times hide in the shadows of its towering neighbours. But very quietly, observers say, Boston boasts some of the most skilled antitrust lawyers in the country who advise clients in industries other practitioners only dabble in. Ron Knox investigates
Country Survey: Germany
The perception problem
Will a rise in private antitrust litigation sound the death knell for Germany’s leniency programme? Emily Gray investigates
Corporate Counsel
Corporate counsel interview: David J Shapiro
Title: Vice president and general counsel
Company: Air Canada
Age: 49
Previous employment: Private practice at a major Canadian international law firm
Global Briefing
BELGIUM: Competition Council opens Phase II investigation of Belgacom/The Phone House
Anneleen Straetemans
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
Brussels
CANADA: Competition Bureau releases merger remedies study
Devin Anderson and Mark Opashinov
McMillan LLP
Toronto
DENMARK: Media companies found to share customers
Jan-Erik Svensson
Gorrissen Federspiel
Copenhagen
ITALY: Four companies fined for bid-rigging
Roberto Amore
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
Rome
POLAND: Competition office imposes strict remedies on UPC/Aster
Aleksander Stawicki
WKB Wiercinski Kwiecinski Baehr
Warsaw
SERBIA: Court confirms controversial fining decision
Alexandr Svetlicinii
Petroleum Industry of Serbia
Novi Sad
SPAIN: Competition Commission fines post operator for breaching antitrust settlement
Evelyne Ameye
Gómez-Acebo & Pombo
Madrid
UNITED STATES: Court removes limits to federal jurisdiction over foreign injury antitrust claims
Ronan P Harty and Edward Moss
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
New York



